Quantcast

Don't have an account? Register Now! Forgot password?

Reviews

DFI LAN Party UT X58

comment Commentsprint Printemail EmailDeliciousDiggStumbleUponRedditFacebookSlashdot

There's a party on this motherboard and you're invited!

Motherboards can’t just sit quietly in your case and service your parts anymore. Today, motherboards also must advertise to the entire world that you have one badass system. Hoping to outdo all others, DFI’s LAN Party UT X58 Core i7 motherboard features a massive heat pipe appendage, called the “Flame Chiller,” that juts out the back of your case.

The idea is to transport heat from the heatsinks attached to the board’s power regulators and chipset to outside the case, where it can be cooled by the exhaust from the case. Does it work? The concept makes sense, but we’re a bit skeptical of the small contact patch the heat pipe makes with the board. The external heatsink never got hot in our tests, but we typically don’t overclock test boards far enough to overheat voltage regulators. The Flame Chiller looks cool, though!

This board’s not all about flash and panache, however. The board’s tri-SLI implementation is certainly better than on other X58 boards we’ve tested. While other boards’ x16 PCI-E slot arrangements force you to either buy a specific case enclosure or hack-saw off a portion of your videocard to get a tri-SLI configuration up and running, the LAN Party UT X58’s tri-SLI will work in most cases.

With tri-SLI as one possible config, DFI also properly laid out the SATA ports. All eight of the SATA ports on the board are accessible even with three huge GPUs in place. Another two eSATA ports are available on the backplane, too.

DFI’s audio implementation is also pretty interesting. Instead of an audio card riser that stabs into an x1 slot or some custom slot alternative, the riser board (with Realtek codecs on it to lower board electrical noise) connects to the mobo via a ribbon cable. This lets you place the board wherever it’s convenient. Alas, while other enthusiast boards give you X-Fi compatibility through drivers or licensed hardware, the LAN Party UT X58 sticks to basic Realtek codecs and drivers, which aren’t quite as good.

After spending some time overclocking Intel’s threadbare DX58SO board (see page 40), we really appreciate how the LAN Party UT X58 offers far more switches and knobs to turn. One thing DFI needs to add, though, is a status page, so you can tell what your tweaks have changed. For example, you should be able to see what DRAM frequency you have selected instead of calculating it manually.

In our overclocking tests with the LAN Party UT X58, we didn’t get our engineering sample Core i7-965 to the speeds that we did with the DX58SO (just shy of 4GHz), but we spent considerably more time with the Intel board than we can with any review board. Spending more time learning the intricacies of this board’s BIOS could very well improve the overclocking performance.

Unfortunately, DFI’s board doesn’t distinguish itself on the benchmark performance beat, either—it clocks scores that are very similar to all the other X58 boards we’ve tested. DFI does set its Turbo Mode much higher than other boards, but that didn’t seem to impact performance at all.

So what’s the practical upshot? We still prefer the features and onboard X-Fi of the MSI Eclipse SLI that we reviewed in February, but the DFI LAN Party UT X58 comes in a close second.

DFI LAN Party UT X58
LAN Parties

True tri-SLI support; all SATA ports are forward-facing.

Wakes

Minimal BIOS tweaking from inside Windows; no X-Fi mobo support.

score:9ka
DFI
Benchmarks

DFI LAN Party UT X58
Intel DX58SO
PC Mark Vantage x64
6,597
7,082
ProShow (min:sec)
10:01
9:12
MainConcept (min:sec) 18:10 18:00
3DMark Vantage CPU 46,541
45,424
HD Tach (MB/s) 213
185
Valve Particle Test (fps)
156
155
Quake 4 (fps)
234.9
224
UE Mem Copy (MB/s) 18,768
19, 182
UE Mem Latency (ns) 32.8
31.9
SiSoft Sandra RAM (GB/s) 26.7
26.3

Best scores are bolded. Our test bed consists of a Core i7-965 Extreme Edition CPU, 6GB of Corsair DDR3/1600, an EVGA GeForce 280 GTX videocard, a PC Power and Cooling TurboCool 1200 power supply, a WD Raptor 150GB drive, and Vista Home Premium 64-bit. HD Tach scores were achieved using an Intel X25-M SSD.

COMMENTS
avatarFeature Request

Could Maximum PC add a third column when comparing benchmark results: % ?

PC Mark Vantage x64        6597        7082        6.85%
ProShow (min:sec)              601          552       -8.88%
MainConcept (min:sec)      1090        1080       -0.93%
3DMark Vantage CPU       46541      45424       -2.46%
HD Tach (MB/s)                  213          185      -15.14%
Valve Particle Test (fps)       156         155       -0.65%
Quake 4 (fps)                     234.9      224       -4.87%
UE Mem Copy (MB/s)       18768      19182        2.16%
UE Mem Latency (ns)          32.8        31.9       -2.82%
SiSoft Sandra RAM (GB/s)   26.7        26.3        -1.52%

Login or register to post comments
avatarWow

I don't think this will catch on.

Login or register to post comments
avatarGreat board

I have one of these at home and I really like it.

The only downside I've seen with the board is the weird heatsink on the Tylersburg chip. Normally this wouldn't be an issue, but when this is installed in a fairly standard midtower case and you're are using one of the rather large top of the line videocards, air circulation for anything lower than that card is cut dramatically. With as hot as the Tylersburg runs, especially if you're overclocking or using one of the higher QPI enabled CPUs, it can get a little toasty inside the box. Because of the size of the Tylersburg heatsink and the way it's shaped, it's not very easy to strap a fan on it to provide any extra cooling.

Other than that, I like this board very much. I've worked with a lot of i7 boards, and this is by far my favorite.

Login or register to post comments
avatarHow hard is it to install?

Doesn't that big honkin' heatsink make it a bitch to get it in the case?  Do you have angle the board in to get it through the hole in the back or is it removable? What if your case has a nifty removable motherboard mount?

Login or register to post comments
avatarThe heatsink is removable

The heatsink is removable and technically installed after you install the board in the case.
It can be mounted in 1 of 2 places.  Either by the I/O ports poking out of the case (as the picture shows) or connected to the large black heatsink where it arches up and hovers over the CPU fan.

Login or register to post comments
avatari think x-fi is just too

i think x-fi is just too overrated. Realtek is a hero for most users. With x-fi we need good quality sound! But most users just surf internet and watch youtube which doesnt have damn good audio just average. So realtek is enough. But i have to agree on such highend board, x-fi is important at the price we pay. without it, well not really high end right?

Login or register to post comments
avatar"...the LAN Party UT X58

"...the LAN Party UT X58 sticks to basic Realtek codecs and drivers, which aren’t quite as good."

Why not? Because they don't contribute as much to the retail pricing? They aren't as "sexay?" I read this in MPC, but when is the argument ever qualified by even a single fact? What does the X-Fi do that's so wonderful, so earth-shattering?

Login or register to post comments
avatarNothing, really.  But the

Nothing, really.  But the MaxPC editors have been licking up scraps from Creative for so long now, they're just used to it.  Either that, or they live in a reality where Creative products don't suck and don't die within three days, and you can always find drivers for any Creative product without hassle or headache.

The rest of us know better.

Login or register to post comments
This Month's Issue
FEATURE Build a Crazy-Fast $647 PCFEATURE Six Single-Band 802.11n Routers ReviewedHOW TOTweak BitTorrent and FirefoxFEATUREClose Look at ClarkdaleWHITE PAPERLCD Panel Technology